Managing the ACA Employer Pay or Play Penalties: The Best Path Forward
Managing the ACA Employer Pay or Play Penalties: The Best Path Forward

Managing the ACA Employer Pay or Play Penalties: The Best Path Forward

As we’ve mentioned before, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) introduces many new requirements for employers. One of the most significant requirements is the employer “pay or play” penalties, which went into effect January 1, 2015 (subject to some transitional rules). New reports—which the IRS will use to determine liability for penalties—must be distributed to employees in January 2016. As such, many companies are scrambling to keep up and striving to figure out what their obligations are. While understanding the various requirements is the first step to ACA compliance, it is only half the battle. To ensure success with the most complex requirements of the law, it is important to have the right plan in place and understand just how an ACA reporting software can help.

So, what can companies do to start on the right path toward ACA compliance? The journey begins with answering three crucial questions.

1. Is the company considered an applicable large employer under the ACA?

Application of the ACA employer pay or play penalties differ based on company size, so the first step is for the company to identify where it fits in. The government considers any company with 50 or more full-time equivalent (FTE) employees to be an applicable large employer (ALE) and thus subject to penalties if they fail to provide health coverage to their full-time employees. Yet, determining whether companies qualify as an applicable large employer can be more challenging that it would seem—a simple head count won’t do. The key distinction is the number of FTE employees, which is a combination of the number of regular full-time employees plus the number of hours worked per month by part-timers, divided by 120. Should that number be 50 or more, the company is considered an applicable large employer. If a company is part of a controlled group, employees of all members of the group count toward the threshold. See this IRS page for more details.

2. Are the health care benefit plans offered to employees considered affordable?

The main purpose of the ACA is to make health coverage more affordable, but this isn’t just a vague idea: the ACA states that “affordable” coverage is employee-only coverage for which the employee contribution does not exceed 9.5% of the employee’s household income. Still, this brings up another question: since an employer is unlikely to know the exact amount of an employee’s household income, how can the employer calculate whether the employer’s coverage is affordable? Fortunately, the IRS provides three safe harbors for determining whether health coverage is affordable. In lieu of household income, an employer may use: (1) Box 1 Form W-2 wages; (2) an employee’s rate of pay multiplied by 130 hours per month of employment; or (3) the federal poverty line.

Under the Form W-2 safe harbor, coverage is considered affordable if the contribution for employee-only coverage is less than or equal to 9.5% of the amount reported in Box 1 of the employee’s Form W-2 divided by the number of months that the employee was employed. The drawback of the Form W-2 safe harbor is that the Box 1 amount is not knowable until year-end.
Under the rate of pay safe harbor, coverage is considered affordable if the contribution for employee-only coverage is less than or equal to:

9.5% X (employee’s hourly rate of pay X 130 hours)

For example, let’s say the contribution for employee-only coverage under a company’s lowest value plan is $100 per month. The $100 contribution would not be affordable for an employee making $8.00 per hour (because $100 is more than $98.80) and would be affordable for an employee making $9.00 per hour (because $100 is less than $111.15).

9.5% X ($8.00 X 130) = $98.80
9.5% X ($9.00 X 130) = $111.15

There is still a third option for calculating affordability: the federal poverty line. If the monthly employee contribution for a company’s lowest cost, employee-only coverage is less than or equal to $92.38, the coverage is affordable under the federal poverty line safe harbor. To calculate this type of affordability for 2015, you would use $11,670, which is the 2014 federal poverty line for a single individual. Accordingly, a monthly contribution that did not exceed $92.38 in 2015 ($11,670/12 x 9.5% = $92.38) would be considered affordable.

3. Which employees are eligible for coverage?

The ACA imposes penalties on employers that don’t offer affordable, minimum value healthcare coverage to substantially all full-time employees. But again, figuring out which employees are full-time isn’t that simple. While “full-time” traditionally meant a threshold of 40 hours per week, the ACA lowers that threshold to include those working at least 30 hours per week, or those who work at least 130 hours per month. How is that determined? The IRS provides two options: (1) the monthly measurement method (analyzing the number of hours worked by each employee for each calendar month); or (2) look-back measurements (which give employers greater predictability in determining their full-time employee status).

By answering the above questions, it will be easier to determine your company’s obligations in these final months before you have to file information with the IRS. The companies that delay their ACA compliance strategy will be at a significant disadvantage and may incur significant penalties. However, by answering these three crucial questions, it will be easier to move forward with the most complex aspects of the ACA.

Related Resources and Articles:

Case Study: Paycor and Jungle Jim's Navigate the Complexities of the ACA

Blog Article: Preparing for the ACA: Are You Ready?


This content is intended for educational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice.

More to Discover

Payroll for Restaurants

Payroll for Restaurants

When you’re a small business owner running a full-service restaurant, you can’t afford to make financial missteps. It’s especially important for small businesses to keep an eye on their labor costs. As all restaurant owners well know, restaurant industry payroll is highly complex making it more prone to errors. Not only do you have to figure out wages for your tipped employees, but you also have the added complication of figuring out shortfalls and calculating your FICA tip credit. That’s a lot of computing—and a lot to potentially mess up. State Minimum Wage Laws States’ minimum wage requirements vary, but federal law dictates that if you operate in a state that uses the Federal Labor Standards Act (FLSA) federal minimum wage, your...

Industry Spotlight - Restaurants: FLSA Compliance

Industry Spotlight - Restaurants: FLSA Compliance

The headlines recently reflect many of the concerns over how restaurants pay its employees. The federal wage and hour law addresses non-exempt, tipped, and exempt employees. This webinar will sort through those definitions and clarify a restaurateur’s compensation plan options. Join Julie Pugh, a partner with the law firm of Graydon in Cincinnati, Ohio, as she discuss what has changed, what hasn’t, and some of the biggest mistakes that can be made when paying restaurant employees. Speaker: Julie Pugh Julie’s practice at Graydon Law focuses on client counseling, employment litigation, and dispute resolution. She routinely represents clients before the EEOC, OCRC, DOL, and federal and state judges. She also worked as a human resource...

Case Study: Diaz Foods

Case Study: Diaz Foods

After receiving tax notices and little support from their HR & payroll provider, Diaz Foods made the switch to Paycor and couldn’t be happier. Not only is the HR department more efficient, but employees have more access and visibility to benefits and HR data than ever before. Discover how Paycor provided the right technology and reliable service Diaz Foods needed to create a better experience for their people.

1099 Overview

1099 Overview

Join us as Paycor's compliance experts do an overview on 1099 employees. Speakers: Arlene Baker and James Schwantes Arlene is a Sr Compliance Analyst with over 40 years of payroll and tax experience. Arlene is a member of the National Payroll Reporting Consortium focusing on IRS compliance. Arlene has been a member of the national and local APA for 25 years and is an active member of the American Payroll Association Hotline and SPLTF Hospitality Industry Subcommittee. She was the recipient of the 2003 Ohio Payroll Professional of the Year award. James is a Compliance Analyst with a legal and tax background. Prior to working at Paycor in the Tax and Compliance departments, he served as an attorney in Cincinnati focusing on antitrust,...