Are Domestic Partner Benefits Mandatory?
Are Domestic Partner Benefits Mandatory?

Are Domestic Partner Benefits Mandatory?

A Brief History: Only What You Need to Know

The roots of domestic partner benefits stretch way back to 1982, when the City of San Francisco enacted legislation to offer health insurance coverage to the same or opposite sex partners of its unmarried employees. “Domestic partner” soon became the official legal term used by insurers and private and public employers.

Also, in 1982, New York City newspaper The Village Voice became the first private employer to offer domestic partner health care benefits. Many other companies and municipalities followed suit. Fast forward to more than 30 years later when, in 2015, the United States Supreme Court ruled that domestic partner benefits apply to both same-sex and unmarried opposite-sex couples.

Federal Law: Domestic Partnership Vs. Marriage

The Supreme Court declared in 2013 that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, which denied the federal government’s recognition of same-sex marriages (even in states where it was legal), was unconstitutional. And with the Court’s landmark 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, same-sex marriage became legal nationwide.

The IRS stepped in and declared that two people are legally married under federal law when they are also legally married under their state’s law. Because of this declaration, the IRS treats same-sex and opposite-sex marriages the same under federal tax law. However, domestic partnerships, regardless of state, aren’t considered marriages.

Employers Unable to Provide Pre-Tax Benefits to Domestic Partners

Providing pre-tax benefits to employees is an important component of the attraction and retention programs of many companies. But under federal law, an employer can provide pre-tax health insurance benefits only to their employees’ spouses or dependents, not domestic partners.

According to the Human Rights Campaign, “Domestic partner benefits are an easy way to obtain a competitive advantage for talent and to drive recruitment and retention of dedicated employees… a plan that does not include domestic partner benefits ignores a significant portion of the workforce.”

Domestic Partner Benefits Laws: By States and Municipalities

Here’s a quick snap shot of the U.S. and which states have laws around domestic partner benefits. For a deeper dive into a specific state, check out the chart below. state-domestic-partner-benefits-laaws

State  Domestic Partner Benefits Law 
Alabama  No rights for domestic partners 
Alaska  No rights for domestic partners 
Arizona  Phoenix and Tucson mandate benefits for domestic partners 
Arkansas  No rights for domestic partners 
California   Alameda County, Berkeley, Laguna Beach, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, Marin County, Oakland, Petaluma, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Francisco County, San Mateo County, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz County, Ventura County, West Hollywood. The following cities and counties offer domestic partner registries: Arcata, Berkeley, Cathedral City, Davis, Laguna Beach, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, Oakland, Palo Alto, Sacramento, San Francisco, Santa Barbara County, and West Hollywood mandate benefits for domestic partners 
Colorado  Denver mandates benefits for domestic partners 
Connecticut  The state mandates benefits for domestic partners 
Delaware  No rights for domestic partners 
Florida  Broward County and Palm Beach County mandate benefits for domestic partners 
Georgia  Atlanta mandates benefits for domestic partners 
Hawaii  The state mandate benefits for domestic partners 
Idaho  No rights for domestic partners 
Illinois  Chicago, Oak Park and Cook County mandate benefits for domestic partners 
Indiana  Bloomington mandates benefits for domestic partners 
Iowa  Iowa City mandate benefits for domestic partners 
Kansas  No rights for domestic partners 
Kentucky  No rights for domestic partners 
Louisiana  New Orleans mandates benefits for domestic partners 
Maine  Portland mandates benefits for domestic partners 
Maryland  Baltimore and Takoma Park mandate benefits for domestic partners 
Massachusetts  Boston, Brewster, Brookline, Nantucket, Provincetown and Springfield mandate benefits for domestic partners 
Michigan  Ann Arbor, East Lansing, Kalamazoo, Washtenaw County and Wayne County mandate benefits for domestic partners 
Minnesota  Minneapolis mandates benefits for domestic partners 
Mississippi  No rights for domestic partners 
Missouri  St. Louis mandate benefits for domestic partners 
Montana  No rights for domestic partners 
Nebraska  No rights for domestic partners 
Nevada  No rights for domestic partners 
New Hampshire  No rights for domestic partners 
New Jersey  The state mandates benefits for domestic partners 
New Mexico  Albuquerque mandate benefits for domestic partners 
New York  Albany, Brighton, Eastchester, Ithaca, New York City, Rochester, and Westchester County mandate benefits for domestic partners  
North Carolina  Chapel Hill mandates benefits for domestic partners 
North Dakota  No rights for domestic partners 
Ohio  No rights for domestic partners 
Oklahoma  No rights for domestic partners 
Oregon  The state mandates benefits for domestic partners 
Pennsylvania  Philadelphia mandates benefits for domestic partners  
Rhode Island  No rights for domestic partners 
South Carolina  No rights for domestic partners 
Tennessee  No rights for domestic partners 
Texas  Travis County mandates benefits for domestic partners 
Utah  No rights for domestic partners 
Vermont  The state mandates benefits for domestic partners 
Virginia  Alexandria mandates benefits for domestic partners 
Washington  The state mandates benefits for domestic partners 
West Virginia  No rights for domestic partners 
Wisconsin  Madison, Sherwood Hills Village and Dane County mandate benefits for domestic partners 
Wyoming  No rights for domestic partners 

Domestic Partnership Tax and Exceptions

If a company’s health insurance plan permits employees’ unmarried partners to be covered and an employee is not married but in a committed relationship, the employer has to provide health insurance benefits on a post-tax basis.

What this means for the employee carrying the coverage is that the fair market value of their partner’s insurance coverage is considered part of the employee’s income. If an employer pays for any part of a domestic partner’s health insurance, that employee benefit is taxable and must be reported on the employee’s W-2 as imputed income.

Domestic Partner Insurance Can Be Tax-Free

It’s possible for employer-paid insurance coverage to be tax-free in certain circumstances. On the federal level, an exception is made if the domestic partner meets these three qualifications. They must:

  • Receive 50% or more of their financial support from the employee
  • Live in the same home as the employee
  • And be a citizen, national or legal resident of the United States, Canada or Mexico
The government recommends that an employee include their unmarried domestic partner in a family plan only if they have a child together or if they’ll claim the domestic partner as a tax dependent. If the domestic partner doesn’t meet the three criteria, it may be cheaper for both to enroll in Marketplace plans.

Some Employers are Actively Eliminating Domestic Partner Coverage

Since same-sex marriage became legal, a growing number of companies have eliminated their health insurance coverage for domestic partners. Their justification is that there’s no need to continue offering the coverage now that same-sex partners can legally get hitched and become same-sex spouses.

It’s important to note that companies are not required by federal law to provide domestic partner benefits even if they offer coverage to married couples, but some states and municipalities do mandate that businesses offer coverage to unmarried couples. In most cases, employees must prove domestic partnership to gain eligibility via registration with their local domestic partnership registry, an affidavit certifying the relationship, or other documentation.

How Paycor Helps

We’re proud to keep more than 30,000 organizations informed and compliant with federal and state laws and regulations. Since 1990, Paycor has maintained a core expertise in payroll and compliance. We established our compliance expertise in the Cincinnati tri-state area, one of the most complex tax jurisdictions in the country, which is why we’re able to handle payroll and tax complexities in a way our competitors can’t.

Talk to a Paycor representative and learn how we can help you mitigate risk.

The information provided in our chart is for educational purposes only; it is not legal advice. Always check regulations to help ensure compliance.


Paycor guided hr software tour

More to Discover

Payroll Errors: 12 Common Mistakes You Might Be Making

Payroll Errors: 12 Common Mistakes You Might Be Making

Payroll Matters The payroll process is a necessary component of any business and The Department of Labor (DOL) keeps a close eye on businesses to help ensure they pay their employees correctly, and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and state taxing authorities are always going to make sure they receive the appropriate tax payments. 12 Common Errors to Avoid Everyone makes mistakes, and we’re hopeful they’re caught before anything bad happens. But it’s imperative to make sure that you’re not making any of these relatively common payroll mistakes if you manually calculate payroll in-house. Misclassifying employees and contractors In the gig economy, temps, freelancers, consultants and other independent contractors are commonly found in...

Dayrise Residential Outgrows Their PEO

Dayrise Residential Outgrows Their PEO

Dayrise Residential had a great problem. Founded in 2011, this multifamily housing and operations company now manages nearly 80 properties in eight states and employs, at any given time, close to 500 people. As the Dayrise business grew, they found that their HR and Payroll needs were outgrowing their PEO. Dayrise needed to streamline their recruiting process to keep pace with the demands of filling new positions. And once the recruiting problem was solved, they needed help onboarding and training employees. They also needed access to their data and analytics—and their rigid PEO partner just couldn’t make it happen. So Dayrise met with Paycor. What impressed them right away was that Paycor is not in the business of flashy demos and “...

HR

Lunch Break Laws By State

Lunch Break Laws By State

Lunch Breaks Aren’t a Requirement for Employers Most employers provide their employees with a paid or unpaid lunch break and some provide additional rest break periods. But did you know that breaks aren’t required by law? Federal law, anyway. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the law that governs wages and hours, does not mandate that employers provide meal or rest breaks to employees. Like many other federal laws in the human resources space, some states have stepped in to bridge the gap. Here's What You Need to Know The federal law dictates that if an employee gets meal or rest breaks, the company does not have to pay them for that time unless: State law requires paid breaks The employee works through a break time (e.g., if they eat...

HR

Age Discrimination in the Workplace

Age Discrimination in the Workplace

Take a Quick Scan of Your Job Descriptions Do they ask for “a recent graduate,” a person “with 1-3 years of experience,” a “digital native” or worst of all, someone who would be a great fit for your “young and cool” team? Do you have an age requirement for certain jobs (excluding businesses that sell alcohol and require the person to be at least 21 years old, of course)? If so, your company could be headed to the courtroom to defend itself against an age discrimination lawsuit. Workers Ages 40+ Aren’t the Only Protected Class In 1967, President Lyndon Johnson passed the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), which is designed to protect job candidates and employees 40 and up from age discrimination in the workplace. While it doesn’...