The ACA in 2016 and the Changing Benefit Landscape
The ACA in 2016 and the Changing Benefit Landscape

The ACA in 2016 and the Changing Benefit Landscape

One of the areas of chief concern for the year ahead in HR compliance is adhering to the various requirements and regulations put into place by the Affordable Care Act (ACA). That’s largely because the intricacies of ACA taxation are still being altered and some are still yet to be implemented, with the most recent change coming in the form of the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act, which came into effect in the middle of December 2015.

Anne Marie Singleton and Beth Bailey of McGohan Brabender gave us a wealth of insight into the recent and forthcoming changes to ACA benefits in our first session of the 2016 Paycor HR and Compliance Web Summit.

PATH and the “Cadillac Tax”

PATH—the Protection Americans from Tax Hikes Act—made three big changes to specific ACA-based taxes. These adjustments are in reaction to the fact that the ACA was meant to be a revenue generator, but it presumably hasn’t lived up to the promise. Now actions are being taking to make it at least “revenue neutral.”

  1. The medical device tax, which initially applied a 2.3% tax to devices sold after the end of 2012, is now under a two-year moratorium. The tax is now slated to take effect on devices sold on or after January 1, 2018, but will be under further analysis and review during this suspension period.
  2. The Health Insurance Industry Tax is also under such scrutiny. This permanent, annual fee on insurers has frequently been passed along to employers since 2014 by way of incremental increases in plan cost. A one-year moratorium has been put in place, in attempt to slow rising plan costs.
  3. The Cadillac Tax has been controversial since it was announced. PATH has tried to lessen the burden of the tax, originally not set to go into effect until 2018, by making the tax deductible as a business expense and delaying implementation until 2020. The penalties on the tax are still stiff, to the tune of 40% on high-cost coverage with no exceptions for grandfathered plans.

This tax is calculated on a monthly and per-person basis, where any plan above $850 per month for single coverage and $2,292 per month for family coverage is subject to it. At this rate, we’re looking at the possibility of three-quarters of employee health plans being subject to the tax by 2029.

ACA Reporting and Coverage

Fortunately, the government has extended ACA reporting deadlines this year.

  • Employers had until March 31 to provide 1095-B and 1095-C forms to their employees
  • Employers filing on paper with fewer than 250 employees have until May 31 to provide 1095-B and 1095-C forms and 1094 forms to the IRS
  • Employers filing electronically have until June 30 to provide 1095-B and 1095-C forms and 1094 forms to the IRS

In this first year only, the IRS will waive penalties for smaller employers that make a good faith effort to file on time, but that’s not to say those that miss the filing deadline all together will be offered this lenience. Penalties get heftier the larger a company is, maxing out at $250 per employee and $3 million total for a year.
On a more pleasant note, the auto-enrollment provision of the ACA—wherein companies with over 200 full-time workers would have to automatically enroll them in one of the employer’s plans—has been permanently repealed.

Trends

To combat some of the ACA employer mandates for small, fully funded employers, those employers are trying to become self-funded. Carriers are reacting with level-funded products (funded in nature, but also taking some of the risk out of the process). We’re seeing new movements in companies or trades coming together to be compliant and become self-funded. Healthcare captives are also growing in popularity.

Another big shift is that of employers’ focus moving to claims over administration costs. Per “healthcare dollar,” 87% of cost is now going towards covering claims. This, in turn, is requiring employers to mine big data so as to predict when claims may come based off of group employer wellness and trends.

As such, companies are giving even more attention to health and wellness programs so as to manage imminent claims and those farther down the road. Incentivizing good health practices is proving to be one of the best ACA cost-cutting measures.


This content came from a March 10 Paycor webinar. Missed Paycor’s Web Summit or want to hear this webinar as it happened live? Click over to our webinar recordings page. And, contact us if you're ready to make sure your company is covered for 2016 and beyond when it comes to the Affordable Care Act.


Subscribe to Our Resource Center Digest

Enter your email below to receive a weekly recap of the latest articles from Paycor's Resource Center.

Check your inbox for an email confirming your subscription. Enjoy!

More to Discover

Webinar: EEO-1 Reporting FAQs

Webinar: EEO-1 Reporting FAQs

Based upon the questions you asked we came up with a list of Frequently Asked Questions to help guide you through the changes of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to collect 2018 employee pay data and hours worked by Sept. 30, 2019. The additional data required by the new ruling and expanded EEO-1 form is very significant. Is your HR team ready? Watch as we discuss the answers to your questions and how Paycor can help.

Case Study: Camp Woof

Case Study: Camp Woof

Years of manually entering payroll combined with the frustration of paying for every custom report finally took its toll on Camp Woof administrators and led them to seek an automated time and payroll product with a robust reporting feature. “My employees now have easy access online to get their paystubs and information. Payroll is on time and the only mistakes are ones that I make and those are easily fixed. The reporting is great.”—Pete Grossman, Managing Member, Camp Woof Discover how Paycor’s Human Capital Management solution helped this pet paradise in Atlanta streamline payroll, giving the owner and managers time to focus on what matters most—the animals.

Case Study: Humane Society of Boulder Valley

Case Study: Humane Society of Boulder Valley

After years of dealing with cumbersome and unreliable HR software, the Humane Society of Boulder Valley turned to Paycor for a modern, efficient Human Capital Management solution. “Paycor provided improved functionality and additional services for the same price we were paying with our old vendor. [We received] a better value and a more intuitive product.” —Jennifer Schwartz, Director of Human Resources, Humane Society of Boulder Valley Read more about HSBV’s experience using Paycor and how our solutions can meet the needs of other nonprofit organizations.

Pay Equity and State-by-State Laws

Pay Equity and State-by-State Laws

When you’re managing payroll, it’s tough enough keeping track of – and maintaining compliance with – federal and a single state’s laws. But organizations that have operations in more than one state often experience challenges when it comes to tracking the always-changing requirements of pay equity laws. Complicating matters even further, some states such as California and New York, have separate laws governing cities and counties. We’ve created this handy chart to help you get a quick view of each state’s laws. State-by-State Pay Equity Laws State Law/Citation Covered Employes Provisions Alabama None None None Alaska Employment Discrimination Act Alaska Stat. Ann. § 18.80.220(a)(5). Private companies and Public employers Employers can’t...